Re: [PATCH] Add nid sanity on alloc_pages_node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > 
> > The patch looks good for this bug, thanks :)
> 
> If you have time could you test it and sent it back at me please?
> 

Test passed and panic gone.
thanks.

> > if other caller give a invalid nid to alloc_pages_node(), __alloc_pages
> > will crash again.
> 
> That would be a buggy caller, so we should fix that caller.
> 
> > So I think we add some sanity check for nid at alloc_pages_node is
> > meaningful.  
> > 
> > another question, if (nid >= MAX_NUMNODES),  may I set nid to 0 directly
> > like following code?
> > 
> > 	if (unlikly(nid >= MAX_NUMNODES)
> > 		nid = 0
> 
> if (nid > MAX_NUMNODES) then that is a bug and we should report it (doing
> this via a BUG() is OK) rather than quietly covering it up.
> 
> if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES) then we should set it to
> first_node(node_online_map);

OK, will do it and send you a patch :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux