generic clockevents/ (hr)time(r) patches was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

Andrew, Linus, 

On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 01:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> When replying, please rewrite the subject suitably and try to Cc: the
> appropriate developer(s).

> i386-hpet-check-if-the-counter-works.patch
> nohz-fix-nohz-x86-dyntick-idle-handling.patch
> acpi-move-timer-broadcast-and-pmtimer-access-before-c3-arbiter-shutdown.patch
> clockevents-fix-typo-in-acpi_pmc.patch
> timekeeping-fixup-shadow-variable-argument.patch
> timerc-cleanup-recently-introduced-whitespace-damage.patch
> clockevents-remove-prototypes-of-removed-functions.patch
> clockevents-fix-resume-logic.patch
> clockevents-fix-device-replacement.patch
> tick-management-spread-timer-interrupt.patch
> highres-improve-debug-output.patch
> hrtimer-speedup-hrtimer_enqueue.patch
> pcspkr-use-the-global-pit-lock.patch
> ntp-move-the-cmos-update-code-into-ntpc.patch
> i386-pit-stop-only-when-in-periodic-or-oneshot-mode.patch
> i386-remove-volatile-in-apicc.patch
> i386-hpet-assumes-boot-cpu-is-0.patch
> i386-move-pit-function-declarations-and-constants-to-correct-header-file.patch

These got sent to Andi as well, but the patches are independent of the
x86_64 conversion.

These are bugfixes (nohz-fix-nohz-x86-dyntick-idle-handling.patch) and
general improvements of the core code and the existing i386 code.

Can we please merge the above now ?

I can resend them or setup a git repo if you want.

Andi, any objections against the above i386 fixlets ?

Thanks,

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/