On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Chris Wright wrote:
>
> That's not quite right. Leaving the code unchanged caused breakage
> already. The PIT is damn stupid and can be sensitive to how quickly it's
> programmed. So code that enable/disable didn't change, but frequency
> with which it is called did and broke some random boxes.
Sure. We cannot avoid *all* problems. Bugs happen.
But at least we could try to make sure that there aren't totally
unnecessary changes in that switch-over patch. Which there definitely
were, as far as I can tell.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
