Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version

On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 05:36:16PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> 
> Why would there be problems?

I'm just asking since I don't know well 64 bits architectures. :)

However, how can I fix 64 bits seconds into struct timespec?

Ciao,

Rodolfo

-- 

GNU/Linux Solutions                  e-mail:    [email protected]
Linux Device Driver                             [email protected]
Embedded Systems                     		[email protected]
UNIX programming                     phone:     +39 349 2432127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
  - From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
  - From: Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
  - From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
  - From: Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
  - From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: utimes() with vfat is problematic
Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled sk98lin removal
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]