Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version

On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 05:36:16PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> 
> Why would there be problems?

I'm just asking since I don't know well 64 bits architectures. :)

However, how can I fix 64 bits seconds into struct timespec?

Ciao,

Rodolfo

-- 

GNU/Linux Solutions                  e-mail:    [email protected]
Linux Device Driver                             [email protected]
Embedded Systems                     		[email protected]
UNIX programming                     phone:     +39 349 2432127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
    • From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
    • From: Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
    • From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)
  • Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
    • From: Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: utimes() with vfat is problematic
• Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled sk98lin removal
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]