Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version

On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 18:36 +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> Sorry I wrote wrong. I meant __u32.

We guessed that much.

> I can use __u64 for seconds but doing this there could be problems for
> 32 bits platforms? =:-o

Why would there be problems?

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
    • From: Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
    • From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
    • From: Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
    • From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)
  • Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
    • From: Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]