On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 18:36 +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote: > Sorry I wrote wrong. I meant __u32. We guessed that much. > I can use __u64 for seconds but doing this there could be problems for > 32 bits platforms? =:-o Why would there be problems? -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
- From: Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
- From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
- From: Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
- From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
- From: Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
- Index(es):
 |