Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue eepro100 removal

Kok, Auke wrote:

as discussed before we really want to avoid having (1) an unmaintained bitrotting driver for X and (2) one that should work because people are being paid to take care of it.

The community has always encouraged us to work with us fixing the last issues in e100 to make it work for everyone. After all, we have all the documentation and facilities here to do almost all of the work.

Agreed on all points.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [2.6 patch] the overdue eepro100 removal
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue eepro100 removal
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue eepro100 removal
    • From: "Kok, Auke" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue eepro100 removal
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue eepro100 removal
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue eepro100 removal
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue eepro100 removal
    • From: "Kok, Auke" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Two trivial whitespace fixes in lockdep/spinlock code
• Next by Date: Re: SMART problems in 2.6.22
• Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue eepro100 removal
• Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue eepro100 removal
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]