Re: [patch 00/10] [RFC] SLUB patches for more functionality, performance and maintenance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:

Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> writes:

A cmpxchg is less costly than interrupt enabe/disable
That sounds wrong.

Martin Bligh was able to significantly increase his LTTng performance by using cmpxchg. See his article in the 2007 proceedings of the OLS Volume 1, page 39.

His numbers were:

interrupts enable disable : 210.6ns
local cmpxchg             : 9.0ns

Those numbers came from Mathieu Desnoyers (LTTng) if you
want more details.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux