Re: [patch 00/10] [RFC] SLUB patches for more functionality, performance and maintenance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/10] [RFC] SLUB patches for more functionality, performance and maintenance
From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Date: 08 Jul 2007 13:20:18 +0200
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3

Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> writes:

> A cmpxchg is less costly than interrupt enabe/disable

That sounds wrong.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 00/10] [RFC] SLUB patches for more functionality, performance and maintenance
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch 00/10] [RFC] SLUB patches for more functionality, performance and maintenance
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 09/10] Remove the SLOB allocator for 2.6.23
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc6-mm1-cfs-v19 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference (reproducable)
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 00/10] [RFC] SLUB patches for more functionality, performance and maintenance
Next by thread: Re: [patch 00/10] [RFC] SLUB patches for more functionality, performance and maintenance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux