Re: [patch 00/10] [RFC] SLUB patches for more functionality, performance and maintenance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/10] [RFC] SLUB patches for more functionality, performance and maintenance
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date: 08 Jul 2007 13:20:18 +0200
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@vger.kernel.org
In-reply-to: <20070708034952.022985379@sgi.com>
References: <20070708034952.022985379@sgi.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3

Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> writes:

> A cmpxchg is less costly than interrupt enabe/disable

That sounds wrong.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 00/10] [RFC] SLUB patches for more functionality, performance and maintenance
  - From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>

References:
- [patch 00/10] [RFC] SLUB patches for more functionality, performance and maintenance
  - From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 09/10] Remove the SLOB allocator for 2.6.23
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc6-mm1-cfs-v19 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference (reproducable)
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 00/10] [RFC] SLUB patches for more functionality, performance and maintenance
Next by thread: Re: [patch 00/10] [RFC] SLUB patches for more functionality, performance and maintenance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux