Re: 2.6.22-rc6(mm1) Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference - git-bisect result

On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> This would seem to be the minimal change, and I think it's right.

Side note: I considered just changing do_utimes() to use 
ATIME_SET/MTIME_SET instead, which would simplify the logic a lot..

But it turns out that the semantics for A/MTIME_SET is that only the owner 
of the file can do that. So the "!times" case is simply _fundamentally_ 
different from a permissions check standpoint, and there we have to check 
for "writable" rather than anything else (although ownership will override 
it).

So rather than simplify the thing, I had to add code. Oh, well.

I do think that it would be even nicer to just have a function that fills 
in the "struct nameidata" from the dfd. I think we should be able to: the 
"struct file" really does have the "f_path" thing with both dentry and mnt 
information, and that would clean up that whole ugly "filepointer-vs-nd" 
thing a lot.

That would be an "Al cleanup", though. What do you think, Al?

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 2.6.22-rc6(mm1) Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference - git-bisect result
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• References:
  • 2.6.22-rc6-mm1-cfs-v19 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference (reproducable)
    • From: Markus Trippelsdorf <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.22-rc6-mm1-cfs-v19 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference (reproducable)
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.22-rc6-mm1-cfs-v19 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference (reproducable)
    • From: Markus Trippelsdorf <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.22-rc6(mm1) Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference - git-bisect result
    • From: Markus Trippelsdorf <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.22-rc6(mm1) Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference - git-bisect result
    • From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.22-rc6(mm1) Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference - git-bisect result
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.22-rc6(mm1) Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference - git-bisect result
    • From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.22-rc6(mm1) Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference - git-bisect result
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.22-rc6(mm1) Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference - git-bisect result
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm] Freezer: Handle uninterruptible tasks
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.22-rc6(mm1) Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference - git-bisect result
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6.22-rc6(mm1) Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference - git-bisect result
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]