Re: [patch 00/10] [RFC] SLUB patches for more functionality, performance and maintenance

From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 20:49:52 -0700

> A cmpxchg is less costly than interrupt enabe/disable

This is cpu dependant, and in fact not true at all on Niagara
and several of the cpus in the UltraSPARC family.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 00/10] [RFC] SLUB patches for more functionality, performance and maintenance
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 00/10] [RFC] SLUB patches for more functionality, performance and maintenance
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Coding style on function signatures (was: Convert tasklets to work queues )
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
• Previous by thread: [patch 10/10] Remove slab in 2.6.24
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 00/10] [RFC] SLUB patches for more functionality, performance and maintenance
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]