On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 11:27 +0100, Mark Fortescue wrote: > Another related point that may also need to be considered is that I think > I am correct in saying that on ARM and on the 64bit platforms, sizeof > (unsigned long long) is 16 (128bits). No, it's always 64 bits. > Should the RedZone words be specified as __u64 not the unsigned long long > used or does the alignment need to be that of unsigned long long ? You have to play silly buggers with printk formats (%lx vs. %llx) if you do that. And you have to make a choice about using proper C types or the Linux-specific nonsense. 'unsigned long long' is just easier all round. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [1/2] 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions
- From: Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]>
- Sparc32: random invalid instruction occourances on sparc32 (sun4c)
- From: Mark Fortescue <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Re: Sparc32: random invalid instruction occourances on sparc32 (sun4c)
- From: Mark Fortescue <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Sparc32: random invalid instruction occourances on sparc32 (sun4c)
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Sparc32: random invalid instruction occourances on sparc32 (sun4c)
- From: Mark Fortescue <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Sparc32: random invalid instruction occourances on sparc32 (sun4c)
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Sparc32: random invalid instruction occourances on sparc32 (sun4c)
- From: Mark Fortescue <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Sparc32: random invalid instruction occourances on sparc32 (sun4c)
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Sparc32: random invalid instruction occourances on sparc32 (sun4c)
- From: Mark Fortescue <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Sparc32: random invalid instruction occourances on sparc32 (sun4c)
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Sparc32: random invalid instruction occourances on sparc32 (sun4c)
- From: Mark Fortescue <[email protected]>
- [1/2] 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions
- Prev by Date: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Next by Date: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Re: Sparc32: random invalid instruction occourances on sparc32 (sun4c)
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Re: Sparc32: random invalid instruction occourances on sparc32 (sun4c)
- Index(es):