Oliver Neukum writes: > USB devices certainly have suspend methods. Indeed, and the USB framework has code to know when the host controller is suspended and avoid trying to send out urbs in that case. Or at least it did last time I looked at it in any detail; it's been "just working" - including suspending and resuming, without the freezer - for quite a while now. Paul. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- References:
- [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
- [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 06/10] Immediate Value - i386 Optimization
- Next by Date: Re: [tifm] Infinite loop
- Previous by thread: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Next by thread: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
- Index(es):
![]() |