Re: [patch 06/10] Immediate Value - i386 Optimization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 07/03/2007 04:18 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
One could, though, use an indirect jump to achieve, if not as good, at
least most of the effect:

	movl	$<patchable>,<reg>
	jmp	*<reg>


Yeah, but there's this GCC bug:

	http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22448

You can't even dereference labels in an ASM statement.

I was told in absolute terms that any use of &&label other than to pass it to goto was not supported, and would not be supported.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29305

Seems that passing to an asm() falls into the same class of problem I had. I think the underlying problem is that if the code containing the label is in an inlined function or unrolled loop, the reference can't be resolved properly anyway.

   J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux