Quoting James Morris ([email protected]): > On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > Patch tests fine for me for expected capability behavior with lsm=n, > > lsm=y, lsm=y+capability=y, lsm=y+selinux=y, and lsm=y+caps=y+selinux=y. > > > > So while I'm opposed to the patch, it appears to be safe. > > I've also tested a bunch of scenarios: allmodconfig, lsm=y,cap=n, > selinux=y,cap=n etc. I was wondering about the uninlining of all those functions, so did a set of performance runs. Found no statistically relevant change in dbench, tbench, or reaim. (tried to run kernbench too but the benchmark failed somewhere and i didn't care enough to look into it) -serge - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
- From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
- From: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
- From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
- From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] fsblock
- Next by Date: Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH][RFC] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
- Index(es):
 |