Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions

[Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>]

On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 07:50:18AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 14:18 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > --- a/expand.c
> > +++ b/expand.c
> [...]
> > @@ -488,12 +490,15 @@ static int expand_conditional(struct expression *expr)
> > 
> >  	cond_cost = expand_expression(cond);
> >  	if (cond->type == EXPR_VALUE) {
> > +		unsigned flags = expr->flags;
> >  		if (!cond->value)
> >  			true = false;
> >  		if (!true)
> >  			true = cond;
> > +		cost = expand_expression(*true);
> >  		*expr = *true;
> > -		return expand_expression(expr);
> > +		expr->flags = flags;
> > +		return cost;
> 
> This passes an incorrect type to expand_expression; it wants a struct
> expression *, but *true has type struct expression; did you want to pass
> true rather than *true?

Gah...  Yes, of course.  Sorry about that...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/