Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions

[Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>]

Al Viro wrote:-

> If you want to test ICE recognition, right now only the following places
> are checking for it:
> 	* bitfield width
> 	* __attribute__((aligned(<number>)))
> 	* __attribute__((address_space(<number>)))
> 	* [<index>] in designators within initializer list
> 	* [<index> ... <index>] - ditto, gccism
> 
> That's it.  We can use it elsewhere too, but that's a separate bunch of
> patches (trivial to do now).

Bah.  You don't escape that easily :)

extern int a;
struct b { unsigned int b1:(1,2); };
struct c { unsigned int c1: 1 ? 2: a++; };

are both invalid yet undiagnosed.

Neil.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/