Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?

On Jun 25 2007 12:06, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 24 2007 21:24, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>> > Try to answer on question "ALSA or OSS ?" using *only* technical arguments.
>>
>> Ok: The OSS cs46xx driver did not support the rear 2 channels.
>
> Yes it is true .. OSS (Hannu tree) dos not provide rear 2 channels in
> cs46xx driver because .. in this OSS tree there is no cs46xx driver :>

I think that says it all why ALSA should be kept.


	Jan
--

References:
- Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
  - From: Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]>
- Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
  - From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
  - From: Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]>
- Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
  - From: Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: use __devexit_p
Next by Date: [PATCH] X86: Update alignment when 4K stacks are used.
Previous by thread: Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
Next by thread: Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]