> If it is native ALSA driver then it will restart after each underrun > and overrun. It is the applications job to do this, alsa-lib provides > all support for this. I have no idea of OSS and OSS emulation in ALSA. OSS should autorestart on underrun and just moan about overruns and drop bits. So if it's not following that behaviour he is IMHO correct for the OSS emulation case. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
- From: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
- Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
- References:
- Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
- From: Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]>
- Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
- From: Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]>
- Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
- From: Carlo Wood <[email protected]>
- Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
- From: "Nobin Mathew" <[email protected]>
- Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 1/3] add the fsblock layer
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RESEND] PCI: Change all drivers to use pci_device->revision
- Previous by thread: Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
- Next by thread: Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
- Index(es):
 |