Humm... Right, so __builtin_offsetof() needs special treatment too. Oh, bugger. Is offsetof(struct foo, a.x[n]) a documented extension?
It is. See info gcc -> C Extensions -> Offsetof Segher - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- Prev by Date: Linux v2.6.22-rc6
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- Index(es):
![]() |