Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 

On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 15:47 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Quite frankly, it strikes me that if we want to do this, then we shouldn't 
> save the _process_ information at all, we should save the "sighand" 
> instead.
> 
> So either we save the process info, or we save the sighand, but saving the 
> "group_leader" seems totally bogus. Especially as the group leader can 
> change (by execve()).
> 
> One thing that strikes me as I look at that function is that the whole 
> signalfd thing doesn't seem to do any reference counting. Ie it looks 
> totally buggy wrt passing the resulting fd off to somebody else, and then 
> exiting in the original process.
> 
> What did I miss? 

Probably nothing... doesn't look good. What are the lifetime rules of a
struct sighand tho ?

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux