> > It does exactly so, please note this chunk > > @@ -330,7 +339,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_signalfd(int ufd, si > > init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->wqh); > ctx->sigmask = sigmask; > - ctx->tsk = current; > + ctx->tsk = current->group_leader; > > > It might well be that signalfd's concept of context is wrong in the > > first place and it should be attached to processes rather than threads > > and that made more explicit in the first place... Yup, looks like I was looking at a wrong patch... I think it's the right thing to do indeed. Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
- References:
- Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
- Prev by Date: Re: Kconfig troubles when using menuconfig - Was: [patch]Re: [linux-usb-devel] linux-2.6.22-rc5-gf1518a0 build #300 failed in zc0301_core.c
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] Make DRM use the tasklet is-sched API
- Previous by thread: Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
- Next by thread: Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
- Index(es):