Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 

On Jun 21, 2007, [email protected] wrote:

> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Jun 21, 2007, [email protected] wrote:
>> 
>>> no, one of the rules for the network is that the software must be
>>> certified,
>> 
>> In this case you might have grounds to enforce this restriction of the
>> network on the network controller itself, I suppose.

> how would the network controller know if the software has been modified?

The loader could check that and set a flag in the controller.

> what sort of signal can the network controller send that couldn't be
> forged by the OS?

Whatever the network controller designer created to enable it to do
so.

> how would you do this where the device is a receiver on the netwoek
> (such as a satellite receiver)

If it's input-only, then you can't possibly harm the operation of the
network by only listening in, can you?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member         http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux