On Jun 19, 2007, [email protected] wrote:
> if a company doesn't care about tivoizing then they won't do it, it
> takes time and money to tivoize some product and it will cause
> headaches for the company.
> their reasons for wanting to tivoize a product may be faulty, but they
> think that the reasons are valid or they wouldn't go to the effort.
Absolutely right. And we'll get to that. Please just be patient.
In fact, how much the company cares about tivoizing is completely
irrelevant to that point. I shouldn't even have included it, but I
did because I thought it would be useful as a boundary condition.
So just disregard that.
Is there agreement that, comparing tivoized and non-tivoized hardware,
we get'd more contributions if the hardware is not tivoized, because
users can scratch their own itches, than we would for tivoized
hardware?
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
