On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On 6/18/07, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> > We use the parameter formerly used by the destructor to pass an optional
> > pointer to a kmem_cache_ops structure to kmem_cache_create.
> >
> > kmem_cache_ops is created as empty. Later patches populate kmem_cache_ops.
>
> I like kmem_cache_ops but I don't like this patch. I know its painful
> but we really want the introduction patch to fixup the API (move ctor
> to kmem_cache_ops and do the callers).
That can be done later. The effort does not increase because of this
patch. If you have the time please do such a patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
