Re: [patch 11/26] SLUB: Add support for kmem_cache_ops

On 6/18/07, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

We use the parameter formerly used by the destructor to pass an optional
pointer to a kmem_cache_ops structure to kmem_cache_create.

kmem_cache_ops is created as empty. Later patches populate kmem_cache_ops.

I like kmem_cache_ops but I don't like this patch. I know its painful
but we really want the introduction patch to fixup the API (move ctor
to kmem_cache_ops and do the callers).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 11/26] SLUB: Add support for kmem_cache_ops
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 00/26] Current slab allocator / SLUB patch queue
    • From: [email protected]
  • [patch 11/26] SLUB: Add support for kmem_cache_ops
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 06/26] Slab allocators: Replace explicit zeroing with __GFP_ZERO
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH RT] disable preemption on running show all regs.
• Previous by thread: [patch 11/26] SLUB: Add support for kmem_cache_ops
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 11/26] SLUB: Add support for kmem_cache_ops
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]