On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
[email protected] wrote:yes, sorry, ultra 320 wide.Exactly how many channels and drives?
one channel, 2 OS drives plus the 45 drives in the array.yes I realize that there will be bottlenecks with this, the large capacity is to handle longer history (it's going to be a 30TB circular buffer being fed by a pair of OC-12 links)
it appears that my big mistake was not understanding what /proc/mdstat is telling me.
David Lang - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Phillip Susi <[email protected]>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Wakko Warner <[email protected]>
- Re: limits on raid
- References:
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: [email protected]
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Wakko Warner <[email protected]>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: [email protected]
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Brendan Conoboy <[email protected]>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: [email protected]
- Re: limits on raid
- From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: limits on raid
- From: [email protected]
- Re: limits on raid
- From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: limits on raid
- From: [email protected]
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Brendan Conoboy <[email protected]>
- Re: limits on raid
- Prev by Date: Re: mea culpa on the meaning of Tivoization (was: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3)
- Next by Date: Re: Versioning file system
- Previous by thread: Re: limits on raid
- Next by thread: Re: limits on raid
- Index(es):
 |