On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > What Tivo did is *good* in my opinion! > > > Can't you get that through your skull? > > No. I disagree. We can agree to disagree on that. Sorry, no we cannot. You seem to not accept that "in my opinion". That's not somethign we can disagree on. My opinion is _mine_ to state. There's no room for disagreement. It's my opinion, and your "agreement" is not optional. So when I say "I think what Tivo did is good", then you'd better just say, "ok, that's your opinion, and I respect you for it". Otherwise you're a douche-bag and an idiot. And once you realize that _I_ think that Tivo did is good, you have to accept that I think that the GPLv3 is the worse license in my opinion. So stop blathering about anything else. Just accept it. Just repeat after me: "Linus thinks that the GPLv3 is a bad license, and Linus is not confused". Don't call me "confused". Don't bother talking about what _you_ think, or what the FSF thinks is the "spirit". Don't say that you cannot understand it. Because if you cannot understand it, the only thing it shows is _your_ lack of understanding. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- References:
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Bernd Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] use __asm__ and __volatile__ in i386/arm/s390 byteorder.h
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] use __asm__ and __volatile__ in i386/arm/s390 byteorder.h
- Previous by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Next by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Index(es):