On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > Yes. They'd have to give up the ability to update the software, or > pass it on to the user. If they can't do the latter, they could still > do the former. How bad would this be for them, do you know? In other words, you advocate license for technical programs that causes people to make bad technical choices? Yeah, that's real smart. That's a sign of true intellect, isn't it? Wrong. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- References:
- Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Tarkan Erimer <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: "Alan Milnes" <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Bernd Paysan <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Prev by Date: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Next by Date: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Previous by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Next by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Index(es):
 |