On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:03:40 -0300, Alexandre Oliva said: > On Jun 14, 2007, [email protected] wrote: > > > If a company sells you hardware that includes a ROM that contains GPL'ed > > software, are they in violation of the GPL if they don't include a ROM burner > > in the hardware? Or are ROM burners like compilers, where you have to supply > > your own? > > this requirement does not apply if neither you nor any third party > retains the ability to install modified object code on the User > Product (for example, the work has been installed in ROM). Do they have to provide a ROM burner if the ROM is socketed rather than soldered into place?
Attachment:
pgpYDWRxSZyJu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- References:
- Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Tarkan Erimer <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Daniel Hazelton <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Daniel Hazelton <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: [email protected]
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Prev by Date: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Next by Date: Re: ext2 on flash memory
- Previous by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Next by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Index(es):