Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:40:47 -0300, Alexandre Oliva said:
> On Jun 13, 2007, Daniel Hazelton <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > (and, in the case of a TiVO, the signing 
> > keys are part of the installation, not the running or building.
> 
> Is installation not a precondition for running?

If a company sells you hardware that includes a ROM that contains GPL'ed
software, are they in violation of the GPL if they don't include a ROM burner
in the hardware?  Or are ROM burners like compilers, where you have to supply
your own?

Attachment: pgpGBCabNYj3P.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: Tarkan Erimer <[email protected]>
  • Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: Daniel Hazelton <[email protected]>
  • Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: Daniel Hazelton <[email protected]>
  • Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
• Next by Date: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
• Previous by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
• Next by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]