On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:40:47 -0300, Alexandre Oliva said: > On Jun 13, 2007, Daniel Hazelton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > (and, in the case of a TiVO, the signing > > keys are part of the installation, not the running or building. > > Is installation not a precondition for running? If a company sells you hardware that includes a ROM that contains GPL'ed software, are they in violation of the GPL if they don't include a ROM burner in the hardware? Or are ROM burners like compilers, where you have to supply your own?
Attachment:
pgpGBCabNYj3P.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- References:
- Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Tarkan Erimer <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Daniel Hazelton <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Daniel Hazelton <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Prev by Date: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Next by Date: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Previous by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Next by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Index(es):