Re: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2007/6/12, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>:
* Tobias Gerschner <[email protected]> wrote:

> I did run massive_intr.c for 60 secs with increasing nproc (
> 10,20,30,40,50,60) waiting for effects.
>
> Below a small table of the results
>
> 2.6.21.1-cfs-v16
>
> nproc ,  usability result
>
> 10 , serious frame drops , Firefox  hardly recognizes clicked links,
> but still usable
> 20 - 30, usability loss ( somehow under cfs firefox never finished
> user requests like displaying web pages or opening new pages , no
> feedback anymore, sudden changes on the desktop )

ouch! The expected load-testing result under CFS should be something
like this:

   http://bhhdoa.org.au/pipermail/ck/2007-June/007817.html

could you send me the output of /proc/sched_debug? (while say a
"massive_intr 20" is running?)

Roughly what hardware do you have? (could you send me your lspci -v
output and dmesg output?)

        Ingo

Hi,

it's a peacock freeliner xp II. Close to 5 year old Laptop with an
Athlon XP 2600+ using 1 GB of RAM / no swap enabled.

The other information will be sent as soon as I am back at work .

regards

--
Tobias Gerschner
Member of Board of Yoper Linux Ltd. NZ

Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux