On Jun 10 2007 19:52, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> > Since the common language of most kernel contributors is english I
>> > personally feel that we should stick to just that one language in the
>> > tree and then perhaps keep translations on a website somewhere. So the
>> > authoritative docs stay in the tree, in english, so that as many
>> > contributors as possible can read and update them. It would then be a
>> > seperate project to generate translations and keep them updated
>> > according to what's in the tree. Perhaps we could get the kernel.org
>> > people to create an official space for that and then place a pointer
>> > to that site in Documentation/ somewhere.
>>
>> No, I think the translated files should be in the tree proper, we have
>> the space :)
>
>We once discussed about .po files for kconfig and back then
>the conclusion was not to keep them in the kernel tree.
>
>I advocated that they should stay out back then.
>But on the other hand I do not see it causing much troubles
>having scripts/kconfig/po/da.po etc araound.
>
>Any opinion about the .po files?
Like with translated doc, they might get out of date easily.
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
