On 6/9/07, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
Would it not be simplest to have CONTAINERS as the top-level
user-configurable item and to then have everything else depend on it?
Yes, OK - it can go that way around too. I guess my thought was that
people would be more interested in enabling/disabling the subsystems
themselves (cpusets, RSS, etc) than the underlying framework. But if
select has problems then it's no trouble to invert it.
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
