On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 00:09:55 -0700 "Paul Menage" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 6/8/07, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:43:46 +0530
> > Balbir Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > This patch implements per container statistics infrastructure and re-uses
> > > code from the taskstats interface.
> >
> > boggle.
> >
> > Symbol: CONTAINERS [=y]
> > Selected by: CONTAINER_DEBUG || CPUSETS && SMP || CONTAINER_CPUACCT
> >
> > Paul, that's just bizarre. How come it was done this way?
>
> Containers on their own without any subsystems aren't hugely useful.
> So the plan was that any container subsystem would "select CONTAINERS"
> to cause the container framework to be built. I'm happy to change it
> to invert the dependencies if you'd prefer.
>
- CONTAINER_DEBUG should depend on CONTAINERS
- the CPUSETS && SMP is weird and should be deleted, unless I'm missing
something
- CONTAINERS should depend on CPUSETS
- That leaves CONTAINER_CPUACCT. One _could_ `select' CONTAINERS if
CONTAINER_CPUACCT but I suspect that'll screw up the above (select does
odd things). I think it's reasonable to have a CONTAINERS menu and under
that, all the clients of it: CONTAINER_CPUACCT, CONTAINER_MEMORY_CONTROL,
etc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
