[PATCH 3/3] cpuset: zero malloc - fix for new containers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

Third of three -- This applies after the container patches,
fixing a problem that earlier patches also fixed in the older
cpuset code.

The container code to present a list of tasks using a container
to user space could write to an array that it had kmalloc'd,
after a kmalloc request of zero size.

The problem was that the code didn't check for writes past the
allocated end of the array until -after- the first write.

This is a race condition that is likely rare -- it would only show
up if a container went from being empty to having a task in it,
during the brief time between the allocation and the first write.

Prior to roughly 2.6.22 kernels, this was also a benign problem,
because a zero kmalloc returned a few usable bytes anyway,
and no harm was done with the bogus write.

With the 2.6.22 kernel changes to make issue a warning if
code tries to write to the location returned from a zero size
allocation, this problem is no longer benign.  This container code
would occassionally trigger that warning.

The fix is trivial -- check before storing into the array,
not after, whether the array is big enough to hold the store.

Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
Cc: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]>
Cc: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Menage <[email protected]>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

---

Andrew - this is the third of three similar patches.  This one
redoes the fix for the container code.

Please apply somewhere after:
  containersv10-share-css_group-arrays-between-tasks-with-same-container-memberships.patch

 kernel/container.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- 2.6.22-rc4-mm2.orig/kernel/container.c	2007-06-08 15:36:14.997835546 -0700
+++ 2.6.22-rc4-mm2/kernel/container.c	2007-06-08 15:37:09.606655972 -0700
@@ -1451,9 +1451,9 @@ static int pid_array_load(pid_t *pidarra
 	struct task_struct *tsk;
 	container_iter_start(cont, &it);
 	while ((tsk = container_iter_next(cont, &it))) {
-		pidarray[n++] = pid_nr(task_pid(tsk));
 		if (unlikely(n == npids))
 			break;
+		pidarray[n++] = pid_nr(task_pid(tsk));
 	}
 	container_iter_end(cont, &it);
 	return n;

-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux