[PATCH 2/3] cpuset: zero malloc - revert the old cpuset fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

Second of three -- This one undoes the first one.  Apply before
the container patch that changes cpusets to use containers,
in order to avoid a patch conflict.

The cpuset code to present a list of tasks using a cpuset to
user space could write to an array that it had kmalloc'd,
after a kmalloc request of zero size.

The problem was that the code didn't check for writes past
the allocated end of the array until -after- the first write.

This is a race condition that is likely rare -- it would only
show up if a cpuset went from being empty to having a task
in it, during the brief time between the allocation and the
first write.

Prior to roughly 2.6.22 kernels, this was also a benign
problem, because a zero kmalloc returned a few usable bytes
anyway, and no harm was done with the bogus write.

With the 2.6.22 kernel changes to make issue a warning if
code tries to write to the location returned from a zero
size allocation, this problem is no longer benign.  This
cpuset code would occassionally trigger that warning.

The fix is trivial -- check before storing into the array,
not after, whether the array is big enough to hold the store.

Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
Cc: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]>
Cc: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Menage <[email protected]>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

---

Andrew,

This is the second of three in the set - it reverses the
first one, to avoid colliding with the container patches.

Apply somewhere before, or entirely merge into:
    containersv10-share-css_group-arrays-between-tasks-with-same-container-memberships.patch


 kernel/cpuset.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- 2.6.22-rc4-mm2.orig/kernel/cpuset.c	2007-06-08 14:57:59.091074320 -0700
+++ 2.6.22-rc4-mm2/kernel/cpuset.c	2007-06-08 15:34:24.336172342 -0700
@@ -1620,9 +1620,9 @@ static int pid_array_load(pid_t *pidarra
 
 	do_each_thread(g, p) {
 		if (p->cpuset == cs) {
+			pidarray[n++] = p->pid;
 			if (unlikely(n == npids))
 				goto array_full;
-			pidarray[n++] = p->pid;
 		}
 	} while_each_thread(g, p);
 

-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux