> So, what do you plan to do? Those handle won't be zero-based. Your > "working" system I immagine will do: > > bleeh[handle - BASE].duh = ...; > > How nice for a working system. If you *store* the handle returned by the > OS, and you *use* the handle to call for OS services, you will be fine > independently from the value handed out by the OS. Well there are two ways I'd do this #1: Throw the whole thing away and accept its not a good idea anyway #2: If I was really going this way and I wanted to use it for serious tricks for high performance I/O then I'd provide the handle from userspace so that the strategy for allocation is controlled by the caller who is the only one who can make the smart decisions - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- References:
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH RT] convert RCU Preempt tasklet into softirq.
- Next by Date: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] KVM - Fix rmode_tss_base declaration
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- Index(es):