On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 04:36:15PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 10:28:22 -0400
> Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:40:58PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Seems best to me - we know the current code breaks a load of systems and
> > > the change should not break anything but fix them all. If we ship without
> > > it being changed then a load of people are stuck with broken ATA.
> >
> > So you have verified that Tejun's experimental change "fixes them all"?
> >
> > Proof? Bugzilla URLs pointing to users that have ack'd this fix?
>
> It unbreaks the IT821x, see the proposed patches I sent before for
> discussion. Those are tested and do work. I've got a test case here and
> its the case that the IT821x card doesn't get the magic trickery you rely
> on right.
Ah, I guess I misunderstood. I thought you were referring to Fedora
7 bug reports, since there are not a load of people with IT821x.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
