On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 10:28:22 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:40:58PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Seems best to me - we know the current code breaks a load of systems and
> > the change should not break anything but fix them all. If we ship without
> > it being changed then a load of people are stuck with broken ATA.
>
> So you have verified that Tejun's experimental change "fixes them all"?
>
> Proof? Bugzilla URLs pointing to users that have ack'd this fix?
It unbreaks the IT821x, see the proposed patches I sent before for
discussion. Those are tested and do work. I've got a test case here and
its the case that the IT821x card doesn't get the magic trickery you rely
on right.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
