Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4 - sata_promise regression since -rc3

[Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>]

Hello,

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:31:46PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>> I can easily reproduce the problem in 2.6.22-rc4. There are no
>> sata_promise changes between rc3 and rc4, but Tejun's libata
>> polling SETXFER change was included in rc4. Reverting it makes
>> sata_promise work again for me.
> 
> Ugh.

Ugh...

>> I suspect that sata_promise.c:pdc_interrupt() should detect
>> a qc w/ ATA_TFLAG_POLLING, treat the interrupt as spurious,
>> and just call ata_chk_status(qc), similar to how sata_inic162x.c,
>> sata_nv.c, sata_sil.c, and sata_vsc.c do things.
> 
> Yes, highly likely.

I'm not sure whether that will work.  I'll give a shot at it here.

> SFF-like controllers (and in this case, Promise is included in that
> list) with their own interrupt handlers need their own polling handling
> code.

One thing I don't understand is why IDENTIFY works.  IDENTIFY uses
polling too.  Hmm...

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/