On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > Randomizing the base is not a problem. Should this be always, or flag > > driven? > > I would say all the time. I don't think it's a problem with > reproducibility in any reasonable code. Agreed. That makes code simpler too. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [patch 2/2] ufd v1 - use unsequential O(1) fdmap
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] ufd v1 - use unsequential O(1) fdmap
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] ufd v1 - use unsequential O(1) fdmap
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] ufd v1 - use unsequential O(1) fdmap
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] ufd v1 - use unsequential O(1) fdmap
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] ufd v1 - use unsequential O(1) fdmap
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] ufd v1 - use unsequential O(1) fdmap
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] ufd v1 - use unsequential O(1) fdmap
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- [patch 2/2] ufd v1 - use unsequential O(1) fdmap
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] [2.6.22] libata: fix probe time irq printouts
- Next by Date: Re: slow open() calls and o_nonblock
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 2/2] ufd v1 - use unsequential O(1) fdmap
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 2/2] ufd v1 - use unsequential O(1) fdmap
- Index(es):
 |