Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]> writes: > H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> It would have to, because of the way code32_start is defined to work. >> We don't get control again after its use as a hook. >> > > Who uses that hook? The impression I get is that the execution > environment for jumping to that pointer is not very well defined at present. loadlin. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Extending boot protocol & bzImage for paravirt_ops
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: Extending boot protocol & bzImage for paravirt_ops
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: Extending boot protocol & bzImage for paravirt_ops
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: Extending boot protocol & bzImage for paravirt_ops
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: Extending boot protocol & bzImage for paravirt_ops
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: Extending boot protocol & bzImage for paravirt_ops
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: Extending boot protocol & bzImage for paravirt_ops
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: Extending boot protocol & bzImage for paravirt_ops
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: Extending boot protocol & bzImage for paravirt_ops
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: Extending boot protocol & bzImage for paravirt_ops
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: Extending boot protocol & bzImage for paravirt_ops
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Extending boot protocol & bzImage for paravirt_ops
- Prev by Date: Re: Intel's response Linux/MTRR/8GB Memory Support / Why doesn't the kernel realize the BIOS has problems and re-map appropriately?
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpuset operations causes Badness at mm/slab.c:777 warning
- Previous by thread: Re: Extending boot protocol & bzImage for paravirt_ops
- Next by thread: Reg: redundancy in inet socket
- Index(es):
 |