Re: Extending boot protocol & bzImage for paravirt_ops

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> 
> Just to clarify:
> 
> In my proposal is that we have bzImage structured something like (where
> "|" is concatenation, and "()" is a  blob containing stuff):
> 
>     bzImage = 16-bit setup | ELF file (decompressor, compressed kernel)
>       
> 
> With the intention that 32-bit only bootloader always loads the ELF file
> as-is and just runs it.  Aside from the fact that its an ELF file,
> there's nothing else about it which really concerns the bootloader,
> since once its loaded and running, it does all its own setup.  Its not
> clear that code32_start really means much in this case, though I guess
> it could point to the same place as the ELF file's entrypoint.
> 

It would have to, because of the way code32_start is defined to work.
We don't get control again after its use as a hook.

> Whereas you're proposing:
> 
>     bzImage = 16-bit setup | decompressor | compressed kernel (ELF file)
>       
> 
> where code32_start points to the decompressor, and some other pointer
> points to the compressed kernel data.  And your intent is that an
> external bootloader could also interpret the compressed kernel image,
> and identify what format its in and handle it appropriately from
> outside.  Right?

Correct.

> In both cases, it seems to me that we need an extra boot_param pointer
> to point to the offset of the payload blob (ELF file in my case,
> compressed kernel in yours).  Yes?

Indeed.

	-hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/