Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
[Eric Sandeen - Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 12:17:53PM -0500]
| Andrew Morton wrote:
| | >Recursive lock_kernel() is OK. | | Oh, it is? Clearly I am not well versed in the BKL... that's probably a | good thing.... :) | | Ok, let me look into it further. I changed lock_kernel to | udf_lock_kernel to complain & backtrace if we re-lock, and it always | immediately hung after that; I assumed that was it. I'll investigate | further. | | -Eric |
Btw, Andrew is there any way to force kernel to use special UDF module
instead of compiled-in one? (Sorry for stupid question ;)

Not if it's already built in (at least not with more hackery than it's worth...) - just rebuild your kernel w/ udf as a module.

BTW my testcase before was bogus, that's not what's causing the lockup. I'll keep investigating now that I know what *not* to look for. ;-)

-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux