Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF

Eric Sandeen wrote:

> Jan, something seems busted here.  I'm getting lockups when testing udf
> on a single cpu with this last patch in place...
> 
> I think it's the BKL stumbling on itself.

To demonstrate, try this:

# BIGFILENAME=`seq -s '' 1 1000`
# ln -s $BIGFILENAME foo

instant deadlock :(

-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
  - From: Cyrill Gorcunov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
  - From: Cyrill Gorcunov <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] Fix possible UDF data corruption
  - From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
  - From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
  - From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
  - From: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
Next by Date: Re: GFP_DMA32 and PAE x86 machines
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]