Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF

[Eric Sandeen - Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:22:23PM -0500]
| Eric Sandeen wrote:
| 
| > Jan, something seems busted here.  I'm getting lockups when testing udf
| > on a single cpu with this last patch in place...
| > 
| > I think it's the BKL stumbling on itself.
| 
| To demonstrate, try this:
| 
| # BIGFILENAME=`seq -s '' 1 1000`
| # ln -s $BIGFILENAME foo
| 
| instant deadlock :(
| 
| -Eric
| 

Hi, thanks for error report. I'm checking this tommorow I guess
(too busy now)

		Cyrill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] Fix possible UDF data corruption
  - From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
  - From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
  - From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
  - From: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
  - From: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ACPI Debug - for test, devel and possibly even for production kernels
Next by Date: Re: + loop-preallocate-eight-loop-devices.patch added to -mm tree
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]