On Thu, May 31 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > (i definitely remember having written code for that too, but i cannot
> > find that in the archives. hm.) In theory we could avoid _all_
> > fd-bitmap overhead as well and use a per-process list/pool of struct
> > file buffers plus a maximum-fd field as the 'non-linear fd allocator'
> > (at the price of only deallocating them at process exit time).
>
> btw., this also allows mostly-lockless fd allocation, which would
> probably benefit threaded apps too. (we can just recycle it from a
> per-CPU list of cached fds for that process)
See also:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/6/16/144
which originates from a much simpler patch I did to fix performance
regressions in this area for the SLES10 kernel.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
- Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
- Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
- Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
- Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
- Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
- Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
- Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
- Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
- Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]