On Wed, 30 May 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> I agree. What would be a good interface to allocate fds in such area? We
> don't want to replicate syscalls, so maybe a special new dup function?
I'd do it with something like "newfd = dup2(fd, NONLINEAR_FD)" or similar,
and just have NONLINEAR_FD be some magic value (for example, make it be
0x40000000 - the bit that says "private, nonlinear" in the first place).
But what's gotten lost in the current discussion is that we probably don't
actually _need_ such a private space. I'm just saying that if the *choice*
is between memory-mapped interfaces and a private fd-space, we should
probably go for the latter. "Everything is a file" is the UNIX way, after
all. But there's little reason to introduce private fd's otherwise.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
- Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
- Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
- Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
- Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
- Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
- Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
- Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
- Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
- Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]