Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 May 2007, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:59:55PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
>>
>>> +typedef struct xfs_fsop_geom_v132 {
>> wouldn't xfs_fsop_geom_v1_32
...
>> and xfs_fsop_geom_v1_32_t
>> ^
>>
>> read better there?
>
> Actually, the current convention would be struct compat_xfs_fsop_geom_v1
> and compat_xfs_fsop_geom_v1_t.
I see. I'll change it to struct compat_xfs_*.
Michal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
