On Wednesday 30 May 2007, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:59:55PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
>
> > +typedef struct xfs_fsop_geom_v132 {
>
> wouldn't xfs_fsop_geom_v1_32
> ^
>
> > + __u32 blocksize; /* filesystem (data) block size */
>
> [...]
>
> > + __u32 dirblocksize; /* directory block size, bytes */
> > +} __attribute__((packed)) xfs_fsop_geom_v132_t;
>
> and xfs_fsop_geom_v1_32_t
> ^
>
> read better there?
Actually, the current convention would be struct compat_xfs_fsop_geom_v1
and compat_xfs_fsop_geom_v1_t.
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
